Bitcoin Margin Trading Options for Beginners (2020 Updated)
Bitcoin Margin Trading Options for Beginners (2020 Updated)
Bitcoin Margin Trading in 2020: The Definitive Guide [Updated]
Best 5 Bitcoin Margin Trading Platforms: The Definitive
Best Bitcoin Margin Trading Exchanges with High Leverage
8 Best Crypto Margin Trading Exchanges Compared (2020
Everything Related To XBT, XBT Futures/BTC Futures, and leveraged crypto trading
XBT, XBTBTC futures trading central, leveraged trading galore. What is XBT anyway, news on XBT, reviews of XBT,Crypto, Bitcoin, Future exchanges, how to properly manageleveraged BTC Leveraged XBT futures trading & margin, best XBT trading platforms, reviews on top btc bitcoin xbt future affiliate programs, data on xbt volume, open interest, liquidations, xbtusd eth conversions! Guides to crypto future trading fee's , & trading on bitmex, primexbt, deribit, bybit, binance futures, & cme futures.
Best Bitcoin Margin Trading Option for US citizens? Anyone heard of evolve markets?
Bitmex has 100x but doesn't accept US deposits. Any sites worth it for a US citizen who wants to margin trade bitcoin? Higher the better. Thanks! Evolve markets looks like it accepts US and has 25x margin trading.
📷Kraken Customer Service Phone Number | +1(855) 266-9652 When we talk about cryptocurrency exchanges that offer Ethereum and Bitcoin trading options for the people, Kraken is one of the names that come to mind. It helps in influencing the margin trading in the best way. There is a dark pool of th
📷Kraken Customer Service Phone Number | +1(855) 266-9652 When we talk about cryptocurrency exchanges that offer Ethereum and Bitcoin trading options for the people, Kraken is one of the names that come to mind. It helps in influencing the margin trading in the best way. There is a dark pool of the private security exchanges where the investors and the large financial joints would be able to trade without any difficulties in the best way. With the help of the Kraken Support options, the traders can get all the information that they need to have about this cryptocurrency exchange. The Kraken Cryptocurrency exchange is actually available worldwide and it is available mostly in the USA. One of the main benefits of this exchange is the fame that it has. It is known to be amongst the top 3 names of the important Bitcoin Exchanges. There is a pretty diverse pairing range of different trading pairs which is another one of the benefits. Just like some of the other top cryptocurrency exchanges, there is a proper liquidity present in this currency. You can dial the Kraken phone number for more details on the exchange. In case you are interested in opening a proper Kraken Account, there is no doubt that it is pretty similar to the opening of an account on some other platforms. Their signups will definitely not be anonymous. In case you are looking forward to opening a basic trading account, there are some personal basic questions you have to answer. For opening an advanced exchange account, there are some extensive papers and documents that you have to provide. Dial-up the Kraken customer support number for more details. Kraken Common Features Liquidity: Low fees for fast funding process and the Bitcoin Dark Pool Reliability: Service available for 24 hours a day and for a whole year. In case there is a customer experiencing some issues, dialing the Kraken support phone number would be enough. Security: It uses some cold storage that is encrypted to keep the funds of the users protected. Bitcoin Margin Trading: One of the main benefits of leveraged trading and that too up to 5x is found here with shorting available as well Advanced Order: Stop-loss orders along automated trading are both available. Proof of the reserves audits: Not every single exchange is audited here. Kraken has evolved the entire industry for the amazing cryptographically verified auditing. Mobile Apps: There are some apps provided for android and iOS. Two Factor Authentication: It provides two-factor authentication as well as PGPGPG encryption. Kraken Customer Support to Have An Account In case there are some users who want to open up the advanced account, there are some specific jurisdictions that are required around the whole world. For those trading, the large volume will have to comply with these rules as well. There are some more details that you can know about in by dialing the Kraken support number.
After China's leverage halting, which is now the best platform for bitcoin margin trading?
I've submitted a general poll to gauge what your thoughts are on the recent Chinese exchange restrictions & which viable margin trading alternatives you could recommend. Perhaps I'm missing a margin trading platform that should have been included? I'm interested in hearing all feedback on this.
Best Referral Links: Margin Trade Bitcoin on Bitmex, Simplefx, Whaleclub, or Binance - use referral link to save on fees. High leverage options available!
BitMEX BitMEX is one of the best exchanges for day traders, offering up to 100x leverage for the BTC/USD pair and also altcoin pairs for ETH/BTC, XMBTC and many others. Use my referral link to save 10% on fees for 6 months: https://www.bitmex.com/registegbz1IA Whaleclub Whaleclub offers up to 20x leverage for the BTC/USD pair and up to 200x leverage for stocks and Forex. Use my referral link for a 25% first deposit bonus: https://whaleclub.co/join/nj2WV Simplefx Simplefx's secure platform offers up to 100x leverage for the BTC/USD pair and up to 500x leverage for stocks and forex. Very secure platform and professional support team. Referral link: https://simplefx.com/?sfx-r=87f74946-c8d7-4fe7-8b02-453eeb09a61d Binance Day Trade Bitcoin as well as dozens of altcoins and tokens on one of the best Bitcoin & altcoin exchanges out there. No margin trading available. Referral Link: https://www.binance.com/?ref=11071206 Thank you and happy trading!
What is the point of Futures contracts for retail traders?
I'm an options guy - hey, to each their own. Since I'm in the process of writing a series of posts on the route less travelled on options trading, I felt it would be best to get this first out of the way. When I first came across futures contracts on stocks, it didn't make any sense to me. Futures contracts behave in exactly the same way as the underlying asset with the added complication of having exposure to interest rates (typically, you can ignore this detail - this detail becomes relevant if you want to add options to the mix, especially so with currency derivatives). The one reason I heard of at that time (this was in 2004) - 'You get a lot of leverage with Futures!'. Sure, but this wasn't a big difference; I typically had to put down about 17% as upfront margin. IMO, this wasn't a good enough reason as this translated to a margin of 5.9x - heck, depending upon the stock, Sharekhan gave me a margin of up to 10x on even delivery trades (again, this was in 2004). If someone wanted to trade intraday, do it with stocks, why futures? It took me a while to get the point. When one wanted to profit off a rise in an asset's value - buy the stock, let it rise, sell - rinse and repeat. How do you profit off an asset's depreciation? You could short-sell the stock; but you had to close the position at the end of the day as there was no mechanism to borrow stocks in Indian markets. Any drop in the asset's value that happens overnight or over the weekend is beyond reach. Entre futures contracts. These things allow someone to keep the position open for an entire month. If you had inside information of the mess that was going on at Yes Bank, short-selling the stock was a horrible way of capitalising on it, opening a short position via futures contracts was the way to do it: you can squeeze the full extent of the drop, with leverage on top of it. Now, that little detail about exposure to interest rates being baked into the contracts, I'll get to that in the next post. When Bitcoin was at an all time high of around $20,000 per BTC, all the Wall St banks were in a rush to offer futures contracts on bitcoin. I told everyone who was willing to listen that this was the beginning of the fall. If Bitcoin was only going to rise, why would a bank offer a product to their customers on which the bank only stands to lose money. It only made sense for the banks to sell futures on BTC if it were to crash and burn, in which case the banks stand to make a killing on these contracts. And the banks made a killing when the crypto market crashed and burned. Nobody seemed to notice that the banks only sold BTC futures, none of them took on a short position on BTC if their customer wanted to short a BTC futures contract. If there were no derivatives on crypto, while everyone involved stood to gain from it rising, it was in no one's interest for the asset class to crash and burn. Now, people can profit off a drop in BTC valuation.
Don't blindly follow a narrative, its bad for you and its bad for crypto in general
I mostly lurk around here but I see a pattern repeating over and over again here and in multiple communities so I have to post. I'm just posting this here because I appreciate the fact that this sub is a place of free speech and maybe something productive can come out from this post, while bitcoin is just fucking censorship, memes and moon/lambo posts. If you don't agree, write in the comments why, instead of downvoting. You don't have to upvote either, but when you downvote you are killing the opportunity to have discussion. If you downvote or comment that I'm wrong without providing any counterpoints you are no better than the BTC maxis you despise. In various communities I see a narrative being used to bring people in and making them follow something without thinking for themselves. In crypto I see this mostly in BTC vs BCH tribalistic arguments: - BTC community: "Everything that is not BTC is shitcoin." or more recently as stated by adam on twitter, "Everything that is not BTC is a ponzi scheme, even ETH.", "what is ETH supply?", and even that they are doing this for "altruistic" reasons, to "protect" the newcomers. Very convenient for them that they are protecting the newcomers by having them buy their bags - BCH community: "BTC maxis are dumb", "just increase block size and you will have truly p2p electronic cash", "It is just that simple, there are no trade offs", "if you don't agree with me you are a BTC maxi", "BCH is satoshi's vision for p2p electronic cash" It is not exclusive to crypto but also politics, and you see this over and over again on twitter and on reddit. My point is, that narratives are created so people don't have to think, they just choose a narrative that is easy to follow and makes sense for them, and stick with it. And people keep repeating these narratives to bring other people in, maybe by ignorance, because they truly believe it without questioning, or maybe by self interest, because they want to shill you their bags. Because this is BCH community, and because bitcoin is censored, so I can't post there about the problems in the BTC narrative (some of which are IMO correctly identified by BCH community), I will stick with the narrative I see in the BCH community. The culprit of this post was firstly this post by user u/scotty321"The BTC Paradox: “A 1 MB blocksize enables poor people to run their own node!” “Okay, then what?” “Poor people won’t be able to use the network!”". You will see many posts of this kind being made by u/Egon_1 also. Then you have also this comment in that thread by u/fuck_____________1 saying that people that want to run their own nodes are retarded and that there is no reason to want to do that. "Just trust block explorer websites". And the post and comment were highly upvoted. Really? You really think that there is no problem in having just a few nodes on the network? And that the only thing that secures the network are miners? As stated by user u/co1nsurf3r in that thread:
While I don't think that everybody needs to run a node, a full node does publish blocks it considers valid to other nodes. This does not amount to much if you only consider a single node in the network, but many "honest" full nodes in the network will reduce the probability of a valid block being withheld from the network by a collusion of "hostile" node operators.
But surely this will not get attention here, and will be downvoted by those people that promote the narrative that there is no trade off in increasing the blocksize and the people that don't see it are retarded or are btc maxis. The only narrative I stick to and have been for many years now is that cryptocurrency takes power from the government and gives power to the individual, so you are not restricted to your economy as you can participate in the global economy. There is also the narrative of banking the bankless, which I hope will come true, but it is not a use case we are seeing right now. Some people would argue that removing power from gov's is a bad thing, but you can't deny the fact that gov's can't control crypto (at least we would want them not to). But, if you really want the individuals to remain in control of their money and transact with anyone in the world, the network needs to be very resistant to any kind of attacks. How can you have p2p electronic cash if your network just has a handful couple of nodes and the chinese gov can locate them and just block communication to them? I'm not saying that this is BCH case, I'm just refuting the fact that there is no value in running your own node. If you are relying on block explorers, the gov can just block the communication to the block explorer websites. Then what? Who will you trust to get chain information? The nodes needs to be decentralized so if you take one node down, many more can appear so it is hard to censor and you don't have few points of failure. Right now BTC is focusing on that use case of being difficult to censor. But with that comes the problem that is very expensive to transact on the network, which breaks the purpose of anyone being able to participate. Obviously I do think that is also a major problem, and lightning network is awful right now and probably still years away of being usable, if it ever will. The best solution is up for debate, but thinking that you just have to increase the blocksize and there is no trade off is just naive or misleading. BCH is doing a good thing in trying to come with a solution that is inclusive and promotes cheap and fast transactions, but also don't forget centralization is a major concern and nothing to just shrug off. Saying that "a 1 MB blocksize enables poor people to run their own" and that because of that "Poor people won’t be able to use the network" is a misrepresentation designed to promote a narrative. Because 1MB is not to allow "poor" people to run their node, it is to facilitate as many people to run a node to promote decentralization and avoid censorship. Also an elephant in the room that you will not see being discussed in either BTC or BCH communities is that mining pools are heavily centralized. And I'm not talking about miners being mostly in china, but also that big pools control a lot of hashing power both in BTC and BCH, and that is terrible for the purpose of crypto. Other projects are trying to solve that. Will they be successful? I don't know, I hope so, because I don't buy into any narrative. There are many challenges and I want to see crypto succeed as a whole. As always guys, DYOR and always question if you are not blindly following a narrative. I'm sure I will be called BTC maxi but maybe some people will find value in this. Don't trust guys that are always posting silly "gocha's" against the other "tribe". EDIT: User u/ShadowOfHarbringer has pointed me to some threads that this has been discussed in the past and I will just put my take on them here for visibility, as I will be using this thread as a reference in future discussions I engage:
When there was only 2 nodes in the network, adding a third node increased redundancy and resiliency of the network as a whole in a significant way. When there is thousands of nodes in the network, adding yet another node only marginally increase the redundancy and resiliency of the network. So the question then becomes a matter of personal judgement of how much that added redundancy and resiliency is worth. For the absolutist, it is absolutely worth it and everyone on this planet should do their part.
What is the magical number of nodes that makes it counterproductive to add new nodes? Did he do any math? Does BCH achieve this holy grail safe number of nodes? Guess what, nobody knows at what number of nodes is starts to be marginally irrelevant to add new nodes. Even BTC today could still not have enough nodes to be safe. If you can't know for sure that you are safe, it is better to try to be safer than sorry. Thousands of nodes is still not enough, as I said, it is much cheaper to run a full node as it is to mine. If it costs millions in hash power to do a 51% attack on the block generation it means nothing if it costs less than $10k to run more nodes than there are in total in the network and cause havoc and slowing people from using the network. Or using bot farms to DDoS the 1000s of nodes in the network. Not all attacks are monetarily motivated. When you have governments with billions of dollars at their disposal and something that could threat their power they could do anything they could to stop people from using it, and the cheapest it is to do so the better
You should run a full node if you're a big business with e.g. >$100k/month in volume, or if you run a service that requires high fraud resistance and validation certainty for payments sent your way (e.g. an exchange). For most other users of Bitcoin, there's no good reason to run a full node unless you reel like it.
Shouldn't individuals benefit from fraud resistance too? Why just businesses?
Personally, I think it's a good idea to make sure that people can easily run a full node because they feel like it, and that it's desirable to keep full node resource requirements reasonable for an enthusiast/hobbyist whenever possible. This might seem to be at odds with the concept of making a worldwide digital cash system in which all transactions are validated by everybody, but after having done the math and some of the code myself, I believe that we should be able to have our cake and eat it too.
This is recurrent argument, but also no math provided, "just trust me I did the math"
The biggest reason individuals may want to run their own node is to increase their privacy. SPV wallets rely on others (nodes or ElectronX servers) who may learn their addresses.
It is a reason and valid one but not the biggest reason
If you do it for fun and experimental it good. If you do it for extra privacy it's ok. If you do it to help the network don't. You are just slowing down miners and exchanges.
Yes it will slow down the network, but that shows how people just don't get the the trade off they are doing
I will just copy/paste what Satoshi Nakamoto said in his own words. "The current system where every user is a network node is not the intended configuration for large scale. That would be like every Usenet user runs their own NNTP server."
Another "it is all or nothing argument" and quoting satoshi to try and prove their point. Just because every user doesn't need to be also a full node doesn't mean that there aren't serious risks for having few nodes
For this to have any importance in practice, all of the miners, all of the exchanges, all of the explorers and all of the economic nodes should go rogue all at once. Collude to change consensus. If you have a node you can detect this. It doesn't do much, because such a scenario is impossible in practice.
Not true because as I said, you can DDoS the current nodes or run more malicious nodes than that there currently are, because is cheap to do so
Non-mining nodes don't contribute to adding data to the blockchain ledger, but they do play a part in propagating transactions that aren't yet in blocks (the mempool). Bitcoin client implementations can have different validations for transactions they see outside of blocks and transactions they see inside of blocks; this allows for "soft forks" to add new types of transactions without completely breaking older clients (while a transaction is in the mempool, a node receiving a transaction that's a new/unknown type could drop it as not a valid transaction (not propagate it to its peers), but if that same transaction ends up in a block and that node receives the block, they accept the block (and the transaction in it) as valid (and therefore don't get left behind on the blockchain and become a fork). The participation in the mempool is a sort of "herd immunity" protection for the network, and it was a key talking point for the "User Activated Soft Fork" (UASF) around the time the Segregated Witness feature was trying to be added in. If a certain percentage of nodes updated their software to not propagate certain types of transactions (or not communicate with certain types of nodes), then they can control what gets into a block (someone wanting to get that sort of transaction into a block would need to communicate directly to a mining node, or communicate only through nodes that weren't blocking that sort of transaction) if a certain threshold of nodes adheres to those same validation rules. It's less specific than the influence on the blockchain data that mining nodes have, but it's definitely not nothing.
The first reasonable comment in that thread but is deep down there with only 1 upvote
The addition of non-mining nodes does not add to the efficiency of the network, but actually takes away from it because of the latency issue.
That is true and is actually a trade off you are making, sacrificing security to have scalability
The addition of non-mining nodes has little to no effect on security, since you only need to destroy mining ones to take down the network
It is true that if you destroy mining nodes you take down the network from producing new blocks (temporarily), even if you have a lot of non mining nodes. But, it still better than if you take down the mining nodes who are also the only full nodes. If the miners are not the only full nodes, at least you still have full nodes with the blockchain data so new miners can download it and join. If all the miners are also the full nodes and you take them down, where will you get all the past blockchain data to start mining again? Just pray that the miners that were taken down come back online at some point in the future?
The real limiting factor is ISP's: Imagine a situation where one service provider defrauds 4000 different nodes. Did the excessive amount of nodes help at all, when they have all been defrauded by the same service provider? If there are only 30 ISP's in the world, how many nodes do we REALLY need?
You cant defraud if the connection is encrypted. Use TOR for example, it is hard for ISP's to know what you are doing.
Satoshi specifically said in the white paper that after a certain point, number of nodes needed plateaus, meaning after a certain point, adding more nodes is actually counterintuitive, which we also demonstrated. (the latency issue). So, we have adequately demonstrated why running non-mining nodes does not add additional value or security to the network.
Again, what is the number of nodes that makes it counterproductive? Did he do any math?
There's also the matter of economically significant nodes and the role they play in consensus. Sure, nobody cares about your average joe's "full node" where he is "keeping his own ledger to keep the miners honest", as it has no significance to the economy and the miners couldn't give a damn about it. However, if say some major exchanges got together to protest a miner activated fork, they would have some protest power against that fork because many people use their service. Of course, there still needs to be miners running on said "protest fork" to keep the chain running, but miners do follow the money and if they got caught mining a fork that none of the major exchanges were trading, they could be coaxed over to said "protest fork".
In consensus, what matters about nodes is only the number, economical power of the node doesn't mean nothing, the protocol doesn't see the net worth of the individual or organization running that node.
Running a full node that is not mining and not involved is spending or receiving payments is of very little use. It helps to make sure network traffic is broadcast, and is another copy of the blockchain, but that is all (and is probably not needed in a healthy coin with many other nodes)
He gets it right (broadcasting transaction and keeping a copy of the blockchain) but he dismisses the importance of it
Best Potential Moonshot Hands Down; TRUSTSWAP (SWAP) Full DeFi Suite, Simple P2P Trustless Escrow, and Great Tokenomics!
Trustswap https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/trustswap Okay guys I've spent the last two days learning about this token and I've come away very impressed. I think this token may be a serious contender for best performer this year. On the TrustSwap social platforms it feels like 2017. Here's some info about the company. TrustSwap is a DeFi project created by the founder and CEO of Uptrennd Jeff Kirdeikis. Most notably he has the largest cryptocurrency investing group on Facebook, and he is what Tom was to MySpace but for Uptrennd. He host The Bitcoin and Crypto Podcast which is actually very good, and he has a massive following on Twitteother social. Better yet, this guy is a marketing genius like a less annoying Justin Sun. He has a pipeline of good news lined up and knows when and how to release that information on the masses. Everything he does seems meticulously thought through. He continually affirms his commitment to get SWAP listed on high volume exchanges with MXC yesterday, Hotbit today, and Houbi/Bitmax tomorrow he is actually succeeding. He is also very responsive and has team moderators standing by in the social media channels to field questions/vanquish FUD. Here are the basics: TrustSwap is building a DeFi ecosystem that will start out as a simple P2P trustless escrow and payment platform and evolve into a fully decentralized exchange (DEX) with leverage and futures options all offered via non-custodial smart contracts. They will also offer multi-chain token wrapping as a service and on-chain governance using the native ERC-20 token SWAP. Imagine being able to wrap BTC, Monero, Digibyte, or any crypto and then trade it on uniswap, or have it interact with Ethereum compatible wallets, and applications. Through this, you can move funds cross-chain without ever having to sign up to a Centralized Exchange, allowing you to never have to KYC, staying fully anonymous across exchanges. Wrapping tokens also offers huge benefits to new blockchain projects that have their own chain, allowing them to save massively on listing fees, as well as instantly be connected to strong wallets and decentralized exchanges. This puts the ability to trust back in the investor's hands and might spark a new ICO boom as new projects eager to establish credibility rush to use it. So yes beautiful wrapping everything layer 3 solution my brothren. And highly incentivised holding economics, for example rewarding users from fees collected from the DeFi network! And staking; All fees paid to the platform will get split as follows: 80% goes back to holders as staking rewards 10% are burned forever (adding that value back to token holders) 10% goes to the dev fund which can be used as the community sees fit This project has massive potential and is already building a strong community foundation with big moves coming soon as more exchanges and markets come on board. The staking and deflationary tokenomics make this a long term HODL for me. Token Metrics: Total Supply: 100,000,000 SWAP Circulating Supply: 62,500,000 SWAP Market Cap: $3.6 million 60,000,000 SWAP Initial liquidity offering on uniswap about two and half days ago, price dropped at like $0.035. Volume bottomed out and rising again (same with holder count). 20,000,000 Team Supply 20,000,000 Marketing, development, legal, bounties, OTC investors, airdrops. LINKS: Website: www.Trustswap.org Discord: https://discord.gg/GNUrcK Telegram: t.me/TrustSwap Token address; https://etherscan.io/token/0xcc4304a31d09258b0029ea7fe63d032f52e44efe Uniswap; https://app.uniswap.org/#/swap?inputCurrency=0xc02aaa39b223fe8d0a0e5c4f27ead9083c756cc2&outputCurrency=0xcc4304a31d09258b0029ea7fe63d032f52e44efe Extra nugget from Jeff on Discord; "@everyone SwapLogo SWAP is listing on Hotbit this Monday! SwapLogo https://hotbit.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/360051689713 This is the first step into TrustSwap's emergence in the Asian markets. We are going to be kicking off major marketing campaigns with an Asian marketing firm within the coming week to follow up this listing. We also have a couple more Top-50 listings lined up for this week as well When we had a vote to see which exchange you wanted to see SWAP listed on, Huobi was the winner by a massive margin, so we will be opening up the conversation with Huobi to get SWAP listed on there also in the near future." DYOR!! Godspeed! I'll see you guys on the other side! To address FUD about OTC investors dumping, yes they are dumping, it's my belief most weak hands have exited the market, they got in at $0.005 per SWAP.
The post 8 Best Crypto Margin Trading Exchanges Compared (2020) appeared first on CoinSutra - Bitcoin Community. One of the best ways to make money in the cryptosphere is by trading cryptocurrencies. Usually referred to as day … 8 Best Crypto Margin Trading Exchanges Comp... Several bitcoin trading sites offer the opportunity to trade bitcoin on margin. After opening the account, a minimum deposit, called the minimum margin must be funded to the margin account that is a function of the maximum leverage available for the user. Although margin trading Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies may attract some level of risk, however, with proper market analysis, timing, and risk management, traders can take advantage of the Leverage offered by BTCC.com and other crypto exchanges, therefore boosting potential profits. Bitcoin Margin Trading Summary. Margin trading, also known as leveraged trading, is a form of trading that uses borrowed funds in order to trade larger amounts of a specific asset. For example, if you have 1 Bitcoin on Binance, you can borrow up to 2 Bitcoins more and trade as if you had 3 Bitcoins. While margin trading increases your profits Deribit is a popular trading platform that has done a lot of things right to make our list for best crypto leverage trading platforms. The exchange allows traders to take advantage of up to 100x margin trading Bitcoin futures or options.
Disclaimer: Trading carries a significant risk of loss and may not be suitable for all investors. Traders should assess these risks either themselves or in consultation with a financial advisor ... Trade BitSeven https://bit.ly/2yEaKiz The BitSeven Crypto Trading Platform is a leveraged trading platform, which gives you the ability to trade up to 100x margin. They have reasonable fee ... Start trading https://www.primexbt.com?signup=87246 Prime XBT allows you to margin trade BTC with 100x Leverage. No KYC or VPN required. Why are we going through all the trouble of setting up a btc-e.com account and using MetaTrader 4 when we could just buy Bitcoin and have it increase in valu... Go to: https://satoshismines.com scroll down to find the video on how that can help you grow your bitcoins. Plus if you want to find out more about the tools...